Level Two Club

UL, ETL and ENERGY STAR on EV Chargers

A charger's box carries half a dozen marks, and they certify completely different things. One of them is genuinely non-negotiable, one saves you money in an indirect way, and one is regularly misread as being about safety when it isn't.

By Stephen V.Last updated How we pick

How this is funded: we earn a commission if you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. It never changes which product we recommend, and we’ll tell you when we’d skip one. Full disclosure.

Pick up any home charger and the box will carry five or six marks. They look interchangeable and they are not: some certify that the unit will not hurt you, one certifies that it will not waste electricity while idle, and two describe how much weather it can survive. Confusing them leads people to buy an efficient charger that isn’t certified as safe, or to pay a premium for a weather rating they will never use in a garage.

Here is what each mark actually covers, in the order you should care about them.

What each mark covers. The right-hand column is our editorial judgment of how much weight to give it when shopping; everything else describes what the mark certifies.
MarkTypeWhat it meansHow much it matters
UL listedSafetyTested and certified by UL Solutions to the applicable EVSE safety standardsNon-negotiable
ETL listedSafetyTested and certified by another accredited lab to the same standardsEqually valid
UL 2594Safety standardThe Standard for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment itselfThe standard, not a mark
UL 2231Safety standardPersonnel protection systems for EV supply circuitsGround-fault protection
ENERGY STAREfficiencyAbout 40% less standby energy than non-certified chargersNice; often a rebate condition
NEMA 3R / 4 / 4XEnclosureRain and falling dirt / plus hose-directed water / plus corrosionOnly matters outdoors
IP65 / IP66 / IP67EnclosureDust-tight, plus water jets (6) or temporary immersion (7)A different scale from NEMA
FCC Part 15Radio emissionsElectromagnetic interference limits for the WiFi radioRoutine for smart chargers

The one that is non-negotiable: a safety listing

A home charger is a 240-volt appliance that draws tens of amps continuously for hours, sits in a garage or on an outside wall, and is handled by people in the rain. It is one of the higher-duty electrical products in a house, and it needs to have been tested by an accredited laboratory.

The relevant standards, per UL Solutions, are principally ANSI/UL 2594, the Standard for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment, and UL 2231, covering personnel protection systems for EV supply circuits. A charger is “listed” when a lab has tested it against those and certified the result.

UL and ETL are equally valid.This trips people up constantly. UL Solutions is the best-known laboratory, but it is not the only accredited one; ETL listing means another recognized lab certified the same product against the same standards. Among the chargers we cover, some publish UL listing, some ETL listing to UL standards, and some both — and we treat them as equivalent. What matters is that a lab tested it, not whose logo is on the sticker.

Three practical consequences of buying unlisted:

  • Your inspector can reject it.A permitted installation generally expects listed equipment installed to the manufacturer’s instructions — see our permits guide.
  • Your insurer may take a view if there is ever a fire, and an unlisted appliance on a high-current circuit is an obvious thing to point at.
  • You lose the ground-fault protection you are relying on. Which brings us to the standard people never read.

UL 2231, and why it explains your tripping breaker

UL 2231 covers personnel protection— the ground-fault detection built into a listed charger. It is why a listed unit will cut power if it detects current going somewhere it should not, and it is doing that job every single time you plug in.

It also explains one of the most common frustrations in home charging. Because a listed charger contains its ownground-fault protection, adding an external GFCI breaker upstream can create two devices watching the same circuit — and manufacturers publish specific guidance about it. ChargePoint’s installer notes distinguish between an outdoor plug-in install, which requires an outdoor-rated GFCI breaker upstream, and a hardwired install, where an external GFCI may conflict with the charger’s internal protection. Grizzl-E’s manual advises using a 20 mA GFCI device where one is required, because a 5 mA breaker may cause disruptions.

Those are not contradictory — they are model-specific and install-specific instructions, and the answer for your charger is in your charger’s manual. The full diagnosis is in why chargers trip GFCI breakers, and the rule that never changes is that you never fix tripping by deleting the protection.

ENERGY STAR: efficiency, not safety

This is the mark most often misread. ENERGY STAR is an efficiency certification, and for EV chargers the specific claim is that certified units use about 40% less energy in standby than non-certified ones.

Standby matters more here than for most appliances, because a home charger is energized and idle for roughly 22 hours of every day. But be clear about the scale: the absolute saving is a few watts, which comes to single-digit dollars a year at typical residential rates. It is worth having; it is not worth paying a large premium for.

The real value of the label is second-order: a large share of utility and state rebate programs use ENERGY STAR certification as an eligibility condition, because it gives an administrator an objective third-party list rather than a judgment call. That can be worth hundreds of dollars — two orders of magnitude more than the electricity. Our ENERGY STAR roundup lists the certified units and our incentives guide covers how to find your local program.

One warning, and it is why our spec tables sometimes say “Not published”. Marketplace listings occasionally carry an ENERGY STAR badge that the manufacturer’s own documentation does not support. If a rebate depends on it, verify the exact model number against the program’s qualifying-product list, because that is precisely what an administrator will do.

NEMA and IP: two different weather scales

Enclosure ratings describe what the box keeps out, and there are two systems in use.

NEMA enclosure types, from NEMA’s own definitions: Type 3R protects against falling dirt and against rain, sleet and snow; Type 4 adds windblown dust, splashing water and hose-directed water; and Type 4X adds protection against corrosion.

IP codes, from IEC 60529, use two numerals: the first for solids, the second for water. A first numeral of 6 means dust-tight. A second numeral of 6 means protected against powerful water jets; a 7means protected against temporary immersion — and, importantly, a 7 alone does not imply water-jet protection unless the product is dual-coded.

The two scales are notinterchangeable. NEMA states explicitly that its NEMA-to-IP table cannot be used to convert IP designations back into NEMA types, because NEMA types include criteria — corrosion, icing — that the IP code does not test. This is why our product tables quote whatever the manufacturer published rather than translating, and why you will see some units listed as “NEMA 4 (IP67)” where a maker publishes both.

Practically: indoors, none of this matters; under an eave, 3R is fine; fully exposed, you want Type 4 or an IP66-class rating; coastal or salted roads, the X in 4X is the specific thing you are buying. Our outdoor roundup applies all of it to real units.

The marks that matter less than you’d think

  • FCC Part 15. Radio emissions compliance for the WiFi module. Routine on any smart charger; its absence would be odd, its presence is not a selling point.
  • SAE J1772 / J3400.These are connector standards, not quality marks. J1772 is the Level 1 and Level 2 connector used across North America; J3400 is the NACS connector. They tell you what plugs into what — see our connector guide— not how well the unit is built.
  • IK ratings. Mechanical impact resistance, occasionally published on higher-end units. A fair signal of a solid enclosure, rarely a deciding factor.
  • OCPP.An open communication protocol, not a certification. Useful if you care about not being locked into one vendor’s app, irrelevant to most buyers.

What to check before you buy

  1. Confirm the safety listingon the manufacturer’s own documentation, not just the marketplace title. UL or ETL, to UL 2594 and UL 2231.
  2. Match the enclosure to the install. Do not pay for 4X in a garage; do not put a 3R unit on an exposed wall in a coastal climate.
  3. Check ENERGY STAR against your rebate, if you are claiming one — by exact model number.
  4. Read the ground-fault instructions in the manual before the electrician arrives, because the correct arrangement is model-specific and getting it wrong is the most common cause of nuisance tripping.

Do those four and the certification question is settled. Then you can get back to the decisions that actually differ between good chargers — amperage, cable length, install type and whether you want an app.

Frequently asked questions

Does an EV charger have to be UL listed?

It has to be certified by a recognized testing laboratory, and UL is the best-known of them — but not the only valid one. ETL listing from another accredited lab to the same standards is equally acceptable. What you should never buy is a charger with no listing at all: it is a fire and shock risk on a 240-volt continuous circuit, your electrical inspector can reject the installation, and your insurer may take a view if anything goes wrong.

Is ETL as good as UL?

Yes, for this purpose. Both are Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories certifying products against the same published safety standards — for EV charging equipment, principally UL 2594 and UL 2231. The mark tells you which lab did the testing, not how rigorous the standard was. Several chargers we cover are ETL listed to UL standards, and we treat that as fully equivalent.

What is the difference between UL 2594 and UL 2231?

They cover different aspects of the same product. UL 2594 is the Standard for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment — the charger as a whole. UL 2231 covers personnel protection systems for EV supply circuits, which is the ground-fault detection built into the unit. That internal protection is why manufacturers publish specific guidance about combining a listed charger with an upstream GFCI breaker, and why doubling up sometimes causes nuisance tripping.

Does ENERGY STAR mean an EV charger is safe?

No, and this is the most common misreading of the label. ENERGY STAR is an efficiency program — it certifies that a charger uses about 40% less energy in standby than a non-certified unit. It says nothing about electrical safety, build quality or charging performance. Insist on a UL or ETL listing for safety; treat ENERGY STAR as a bonus that also happens to unlock a lot of rebate programs.

Can NEMA enclosure ratings be converted to IP ratings?

Not backwards, and NEMA says so explicitly: its own NEMA-to-IP table cannot be used to convert IP designations back into NEMA types. The two scales test for different things — NEMA types include criteria like corrosion and icing that the IP code does not address. That is why we quote whatever a manufacturer publishes rather than translating one into the other, and why some spec tables on this site show a NEMA rating and others an IP code.

Will an uncertified charger fail an electrical inspection?

It can, and that is a good reason to check before buying rather than after installing. Electrical inspection generally expects listed equipment installed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and an unlisted 240-volt appliance drawing 40 amps continuously is exactly the kind of thing an inspector is there to catch. Given how many properly listed chargers are available at every price point, there is no reason to take the risk.

Sources

  • UL Solutions — EV Charging Infrastructure ServicesUL on EVSE safety certification: ANSI/UL 2594 is the Standard for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (accessed July 19, 2026)
  • ENERGY STAR — Electric Vehicle ChargersENERGY STAR on EVSE efficiency: certified chargers use about 40% less energy in standby than non-certified units (accessed July 19, 2026)
  • NEMA — Enclosure Types (definitions from NEMA 250)NEMA's own definitions: Type 3R protects against falling dirt and rain, sleet and snow; Type 4 adds windblown dust, splashing and hose-directed water; Type 4X adds protection against corrosion. NEMA also states its NEMA-to-IP table cannot be used to convert IP designations back to NEMA types (accessed July 20, 2026)
  • IEC 60529 — Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code), full textThe IP code standard (verbatim national adoption, IS/IEC 60529:2001): first numeral 6 = dust-tight; second numeral 6 = protected against powerful water jets; second numeral 7 = protected against temporary immersion, and a 7 alone does not imply water-jet protection unless dual coded (accessed July 20, 2026)
  • NFPA — Using the Latest NEC for EV Charger InstallationsNFPA on NEC (NFPA 70) Article 625: EV charging is a continuous load, so circuits are sized to 125% of load (the 80% rule) (accessed July 19, 2026)
  • SAE International — J1772 Conductive Charge CouplerThe SAE J1772 connector standard for AC Level 1 and Level 2 charging in North America (accessed July 19, 2026)
  • ChargePoint — Home Flex datasheet (PDF)ChargePoint's own datasheet: enclosure rating Type 3R per UL 50E, operating temperature -22F to 122F, 23 ft cable, plus installer notes that an outdoor plug-in install requires an outdoor-rated GFCI breaker upstream while an external GFCI may conflict with the charger's internal ground-fault protection on a hardwired install (accessed July 20, 2026)
  • United Chargers — Grizzl-E Classic user manual (PDF)Grizzl-E's own manual: NEMA 4 indoor/outdoor installation rating, operating temperature -22F to 122F, a caution that the enclosure's water rating cannot be guaranteed if the unit is mounted upside down, and a note to use a 20mA GFCI breaker where one is required because a 5mA breaker may cause disruptions (accessed July 20, 2026)

Keep reading